Mobile Application Development Platforms (MADP) Classification


With the exceptional boom of cellular app adoption, corporations are confronted with demanding situations to expand and maintain the apps that work on these kinds of various systems and devices to reach the wider target audience. Developers additionally face the undertaking of maintaining steady appearance-and-feel throughout device/OS.

Mobile Application Development Platform (MADP), as the call indicates, provides development tools and frameworks for constructing Business-to-Employee (B2E) and Business-to-Consumer (B2C) mobile packages. In addition to imparting the tools, those structures also offer middleware servers to attach and synchronize the records with the returned stop systems, removes the duplicate paintings through allowing enterprise common sense to be written and maintained in a single location. You can construct tighter integration with tool features via the use of these MADP gear.Application Development

Following are the number one traits that any MADP gear must possess:

Integrated Development Environment (IDE): offering Visual Editors/Plugins, Form Builders, Property Builders, Debuggers and Source Control Integration.

Mobile App Development and Debugging: an Explicit guide for platform devices/emulators, platform particular code generations etc.

Multi-Device O/S assist and integration: Multi-tool platform support with Device Specific Code Optimization, Device Specific Runtime, Device Specific Feature integration and Tighter integration with the tool.

Packaging and Provisioning Mobile Apps: Supporting Native and Hybrid deployments, Single Build Process for all platforms, Inbuilt Application signing, Provisioning Flexibility of Single App – Single Platform, Single App – Multiple Platforms.

Middleware Server: the Application server that hosts the again quit service integration additives managing the device registrations, safety, and transaction control. Also takes care of Mobile Resource Management primarily based on User, Device & Network context.

Enterprise Application Integration: Adapters for integration with ERP/CRM and different Backend systems. Support for Data Mappers, Prebuilt Data Transformers, Data Chunking and Server Side Cache.

Security and Remote Management: Support for Device information encryption, disabling automobile entire features, OTA based totally Application Management &Updates Device Capability Management (strength intake, networking).
On a large degree, these MADP gear primarily based on their improvement framework & packaging fashion may be categorized into categories

Native construct gear and
Hybrid build equipment
Native Build tools: This is a popular and conventional technique being following by means of the device providers who are in cell marketplace for a long term. Products constructed in this approach provide sophisticated IDE equipment to construct utility the usage of their propriety frameworks. In this technique, it’s miles the duty of the tool to make the mobile software device agnostic.

Once the developer builds the cell mission inside the device and specifies the centered structures, it robotically creates the optimized local package for the respective platform. Platform/Device particular runtime not best looks after UI display screen optimization but additionally handles the memory, electricity &bandwidth control. These IDEs also come with platform particular assets sheets for configuring capabilities which are specific to the specific platform.

Provides sturdy middleware functions together with offline facts synchronization, on tool security, lower back give up system integration, transaction management, serving the statistics based on personal context and so on.

This approach has its own proportion of Pros and Cons.


Provides state-of-the-art WYSIWYG editors, using drag and drop editor, script & expression builders and belongings sheet functions
Guarantees platform and tool range
Good Performance generates optimized local based on the target platform and device
Time to marketplace is very much less, using write as soon as and installation on multiple systems

Architecture is constructed using proprietary framework
Vendor lock-in
Requires mastering a brand new skillset such as a brand new scripting language, a brand new IDE, and so forth.
Cost of possession is excessive, license is Device/Session primarily based and in only a few cases it’s miles CPU primarily based
Top MDAP merchandise that falls underneath this category are KonyOne, Antenna AMPchroma, Syclo and many others.,

Hybrid Build equipment: As the call suggests mobile apps built the use of these tools depends upon HTML5 hybrid frameworks for constructing tool agnostic packages. Products in this class, generally pay attention greater on imparting the middleware server capabilities that act as a gateway between the mobiles apps and backend organization structures. Most of those gear use REST Web services for integration with backend systems.

For constructing device agonistic UI, those tools depend upon frameworks which includes JQuery Mobile, Sencha Touch, Dojo Mobile and many others. Using those UI frameworks, developer has to excellent song the HTML5 & CSS within the app to render the UI unique to the platform/device. For having access to the tool functions consisting of gallery, contacts, accelerometer, digicam, GPS and so forth. These tools depend upon hybrid frameworks which include PhoneGap/Cordova.

This approach has its own proportion of Pros and Cons.


Follows Open Standards, Architecture is built on top of open requirements
Framework flexibility, allows developers to select the kind of UI framework device they need to use
Skillset reuse, leverages current funding carried out in internet improvement abilties
Vendor Lock-in is restrained to protection and synchronization capabilities
Cost of Ownership is less, Licensing is liberal with the availability of open source equipment

Does not guarantee tool diversity, developer ought to rely on UI frameworks to construct go platform UI and exceptional track it to unique platform/device
User Experience Performance lags at the back of the local technique, hybrid code aren’t usually optimized for the unique platform on which app is strolling
Time to marketplace is more, builders need to jot down/tweak the code for each platform and screen resolutions
Top MDAP products that fall below this class are IBM Worklight, Convertigo, SUP, OpenMEAP and many others.,

Existing middleware providers have slowly started out searching for this technique. With their present day energy of offering strong middleware, safety and EAI capabilities they can without problems construct & upload Hybrid Build MADP tool into their portfolio.


No doubt, Native Build tools with their sturdy characteristic set have continually stood on top at some stage in any MADP opinions, however, they’re unable to make speedy inroads into companies because of their rigid licensing models and excessive license cost. Vendor lock-in is every other bottle neck that is influencing CIOs to have 2nd thought earlier than going beforehand with Native Build MADP equipment. Due to loss of requirements specification (eg., JEE, JDO) in MADP area, providers have no preference, however, to build equipment the use of propriety standards. This is a high time for tool providers to come collectively to define requirements in this area.Mobile

On the alternative hand, Hybrid Build equipment although having inferior features than its counterpart is making inroads into the corporations due their open standard implementation that revolves around HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript requirements. Due to their flexible licensing fashions and open requirements, CIOs are unable to resist themselves from searching ahead to buy these gear. The other main gain of using Hybrid Build tool for CIOs is, now they can reuse their current net improvement groups (with JavaScript, HTML, CSS skillset) to construct cellular apps.